The First Male Pregnancy

One of the greatest stories of our time?



What do you think?

Read some excerpts from an interview in Paperveins magazine.

Janice
Mr. Lee, as we just discussed, male pregnancy may prove to be an extremely dangerous medical procedure at this point – particularly when your doctors perform your Cesarian operation. Why have you chosen to do this?

Mr. Lee
A lot of people have cast this endeavor as something terribly monstrous – a startling example of how science and medicine have simply gone too far. From my perspective, however, I am simply bringing a child into this world. There is nothing more natural and beautiful on this earth than that. This is something that I've always wanted to do. ....

.... Janice
How would you respond to people who would consider you a pregnant transvestite and not a pregnant man?

Mr. Lee
Well, it's not really accurate. I'm still male afterall – biologically and anatomically. It's interesting that some people believe the definition of being a man is so precarious! And unlike the men who feel this strong desire to physically become women, I've never wished for that ... and I haven't done that. I have, however, always wanted to have a much stronger empathy with women. I love my mother and sister very much, and I'm very happy to share in something they have both experienced. Being pregnant is a wonderful feeling. It's something that all human beings – both men and women – should experience before they die. This process has been a spiritual rebirth for me.

Comments

Minh-Tam Le said…
I admit I was appalled at first at the thought of a man being pregnant, but then I read Mr. Lee’s comment about the action of bringing a child into this world as “nothing more natural and beautiful on this earth than that.” His words reminded me of seahorses. These little fishes share the role of reproduction in a sense. “The male seahorse is equipped with a brood pouch on the ventral, or front-facing, side. When mating, the female seahorse deposits the eggs in the male's pouch, which the male then internally fertilizes. The male carries the eggs until they emerge, expelling fully-developed, miniature seahorses in the water.” Source: Wikipedia. A possible argument here: is it right to compare animals to humans?
The possibility of a man reproducing is strange to me. I’ve only seen it once in a 1994 film starring Arnold Schwarzeneggar and Emma Thompson called “Junior.” I cannot wrap my mind around such an idea, because the ideals of my culture defy it. Yes, women do want men to share a role in parenthood, but do a majority of women want men to dip into this territory? A territory that woman have dominated for over ten thousand years. My mom often makes jokes that my dad is three months pregnant because of his beer belly, but she and I both know that if such a concept could be brought into reality, it would score a place on the charts of controversial issues along with same sex marriage and stem cell research. Would such a “convenience” to women and men improve or degrade marriage and society as a whole? For women who are work-alcoholic and don’t want to slow down to start their pregnancies, could/would they ask their husband to take the “burden” instead? Because, as the video explained, the procedure has to be medically carried out, men cannot get “accidentally” pregnant. I feel that the possibility of men becoming pregnant would drastically change female and male roles in our society. For me, the main difference between my mom and dad is that my mom gave birth to me and my dad was sleeping on a bench in the hospital. If a man could give birth, would his child call him “dad” or “mom”? In my Vietnamese culture, the hardship that a mother endures to bring up her child is highly emphasized, especially in traditional songs and lullabies. Laboring on the field for hours is nothing compared to the adversity that a mother faces with pregnancy and raising her child.
When I discovered that the video was “art,” I was surprised. The subject was so compelling. The story was laid out so carefully and cleverly that I believed it. Of course, I was going to hop onto google later and find out more, but for that moment I was hooked. I can understand the range of people who angrily responded to this video without researching. Blind arguments are rarely safe.
Céline said…
When I first saw the video I immediately thought that we were perhaps viewing the recent pregnant man phenomenon that was on Oprah and all over the news. Then I realized the face was wrong and "Dr. Finneous" said Mr. Lee had no uterus. That's when I went, "Wait, what?" So I will comment on both instances. As for the video we saw in class, I was incredibly suspicious when the doctor mentioned no uterus and that it was safe for a baby to grow in the abdominal cavity. I mean that couldn't possibly be safe for a baby hanging out right by your intestines and stomach. Another point was that I was fairly skeptical that an abdominal cavity could expand like a uterus would during pregnancy. Also, I am pretty sure I can say I have met no man(biologically speaking) in my life that would desire the act of pregnancy. It was at that point that my group member next to me researched it and found out it was a viral campaign. I thought this was interesting because our project was related to this concept. It is funny how people believe anything once you tack on a doctor to it. As for the recent "male pregnancy" of Thomas Beatie that I remembered from tabloids, news and Oprah, I will say that I was a bit upset about it. Mind you not for the fact that this person was pregnant or the couple's lifestyle. I was upset because it had caused an upheaval. I didn't get why it was that controversial because Thomas Beatie was in an anatomical sense still a woman. Thomas Beatie was a transgender woman that had breast removal surgery and hormone treatment and was married to a woman. So he looked like a regular guy, yet Mr. Beatie hadn't undergone gender reassignment surgery. So, anatomically speaking, there wasn't anything very different or outstanding or controversial about it. So it was inaccurate to say pregnant man. And people just went nuts with it, when really there isn't anything unnatural about it.
Krystal said…
[SPOILER ALERT]

Before finding the truth, I was disgusted and somewhat ashamed. Ashamed because a fellow human would dear to break such sacred barriers and also so that the definition of motherhood could be so easily crushed. Civilization was built around the delicacy of women, they were not sent to war, their jobs were not strenuous- EVER HEAR OF A THING CALLED "LADIES FIRST". Do you know why it's ladies first, because we can bear children! I can believe I feel for this I'm upset for being so susceptible...this storyteller is good
Anonymous said…
My initial reaction was "I wonder how they did it..." I've always been a sucker for medical oddity programs so this didn't really strike me as all that odd--especially since the doctor mentioned "recent successful ectopic pregnancies" and I'd seen a special not too long ago about a woman successfully carrying... I think it was a set of ectopic twins to term (they even mentioned the implications it had for something like male pregnancy in the program).
There were a few things that made me suspicious, but not enough to give it away. One was Mr. Lee's description of the pregnancy as a "project" which I just sort of wrote off as Mr. Lee being kind of an ass (you shouldn't get pregnant just for the experience--what about the child?! was my thinking). The next thing I thought was a bit off was the CT scan of Mr. Lee--it looked like the baby was in a uterus as opposed to just an amniotic sac in the abdominal cavity, but then I thought that perhaps that could be explained through some kind of transplant or whatnot required for the procedure to be more safe (since ectopic pregnancies are incredibly dangerous). Then I guess the last thing that stood out to me was simply the idea that there was no mention of previous research/experimentation aside from successful ectopic pregnancies in women and generally doing something that would be considered extremely unethical (especially if the child ended up horribly deformed or something) and probably illegal in the US. But again, I was willing to ignore it since I only had a limited amount of information.

In retrospect I'm kind of amazed at how much was off about it, yet I was still willing to believe it. The more I think about it, this sort of thing is just like executing a good troll on a message board, isn't it? It manages to hit all the sore spots without looking suspicious.
Lamesha said…
Being a science geek, I was aware that there was no way a male could conceive a child, but I was convinced that this was true. Everything was so real. He even had CNN, and very valuable sources to prove the validity of this male pregnancy. Yes, I know the idea of a man being able to give birth to a child sounds ludicrous, but what if men were given that opportunity. Would our society be ready for such a change in human nature. Many people would say that it defies the purpose of gender roles, but many would argue that men should have the opportunity to experience an event that is so beautiful; producing life. Imagine those homosexual male couples, they would now have the chance to create a baby on their own, without having to adopt kids. This would make gay couples really happy.
Even if men were able to bear a child; how many would actually want to? This could be a masculinity issue. Many straight men would think that this is a feminine thing, but they are right this is naturally for women.
This idea of male pregnancy would upset many people, but it would also make some really happy.

Popular Posts